| Title |
A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-13-59 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tanis R Fenton, Jae H Kim |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to revise the 2003 Fenton Preterm Growth Chart, specifically to: a) harmonize the preterm growth chart with the new World Health Organization (WHO) Growth Standard, b) smooth the data between the preterm and WHO estimates, informed by the Preterm Multicentre Growth (PreM Growth) study while maintaining data integrity from 22 to 36 and at 50 weeks, and to c) re-scale the chart x-axis to actual age (rather than completed weeks) to support growth monitoring. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 11% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1179 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 161 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 123 | 10% |
| Other | 113 | 9% |
| Researcher | 108 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 95 | 8% |
| Other | 269 | 23% |
| Unknown | 324 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 526 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 108 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 1% |
| Other | 107 | 9% |
| Unknown | 372 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,695,688
of 24,746,716 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#376
of 3,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,041
of 201,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#5
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,746,716 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.