↓ Skip to main content

CaMKII-Dependent Phosphorylation of the GTPase Rem2 Is Required to Restrict Dendritic Complexity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
CaMKII-Dependent Phosphorylation of the GTPase Rem2 Is Required to Restrict Dendritic Complexity
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, April 2013
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.3861-12.2013
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The morphogenesis of the dendritic arbor is a critical aspect of neuronal development, ensuring that proper neural networks are formed. However, the molecular mechanisms that underlie this dendritic remodeling remain obscure. We previously established the activity-regulated GTPase Rem2 as a negative regulator of dendritic complexity. In this study, we identify a signaling pathway whereby Rem2 regulates dendritic arborization through interactions with Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent kinases (CaMKs) in rat hippocampal neurons. Specifically, we demonstrate that Rem2 functions downstream of CaMKII but upstream of CaMKIV in a pathway that restricts dendritic complexity. Furthermore, we show that Rem2 is a novel substrate of CaMKII and that phosphorylation of Rem2 by CaMKII regulates Rem2 function and subcellular localization. Overall, our results describe a unique signal transduction network through which Rem2 and CaMKs function to restrict dendritic complexity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 2 6%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 31 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 59%
Neuroscience 5 15%
Mathematics 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2013.
All research outputs
#28,633,246
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#21,152
of 23,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,540
of 248,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#340
of 385 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 385 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.