↓ Skip to main content

Analyzing work-as-imagined and work-as-done of incident management teams using interaction episode analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Analyzing work-as-imagined and work-as-done of incident management teams using interaction episode analysis
Published in
Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, December 2022
DOI 10.1080/1463922x.2022.2153495
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 14%
Lecturer 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Psychology 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 9 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2022.
All research outputs
#18,881,258
of 23,394,907 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science
#122
of 154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,336
of 433,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,394,907 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 154 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.