↓ Skip to main content

Molnupiravir plus usual care versus usual care alone as early treatment for adults with COVID-19 at increased risk of adverse outcomes (PANORAMIC): an open-label, platform-adaptive randomised…

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
225 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molnupiravir plus usual care versus usual care alone as early treatment for adults with COVID-19 at increased risk of adverse outcomes (PANORAMIC): an open-label, platform-adaptive randomised controlled trial
Published in
The Lancet, December 2022
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02597-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher C Butler, F D Richard Hobbs, Oghenekome A Gbinigie, Najib M Rahman, Gail Hayward, Duncan B Richards, Jienchi Dorward, David M Lowe, Joseph F Standing, Judith Breuer, Saye Khoo, Stavros Petrou, Kerenza Hood, Jonathan S Nguyen-Van-Tam, Mahendra G Patel, Benjamin R Saville, Joe Marion, Emma Ogburn, Julie Allen, Heather Rutter, Nick Francis, Nicholas P B Thomas, Philip Evans, Melissa Dobson, Tracie-Ann Madden, Jane Holmes, Victoria Harris, May Ee Png, Mark Lown, Oliver van Hecke, Michelle A Detry, Christina T Saunders, Mark Fitzgerald, Nicholas S Berry, Lazaro Mwandigha, Ushma Galal, Sam Mort, Bhautesh D Jani, Nigel D Hart, Haroon Ahmed, Daniel Butler, Micheal McKenna, Jem Chalk, Layla Lavallee, Elizabeth Hadley, Lucy Cureton, Magdalena Benysek, Monique Andersson, Maria Coates, Sarah Barrett, Clare Bateman, Jennifer C Davies, Ivy Raymundo-Wood, Andrew Ustianowski, Andrew Carson-Stevens, Ly-Mee Yu, Paul Little, PANORAMIC Trial Collaborative Group, Akosua A Agyeman, Tanveer Ahmed, Damien Allcock, Adrian Beltran-Martinez, Oluseye E Benedict, Nigel Bird, Laura Brennan, Julianne Brown, Gerard Burns, Mike Butler, Zelda Cheng, Ruth Danson, Nigel de Kare-Silver, Devesh Dhasmana, Jon Dickson, Serge Engamba, Stacey Fisher, Robin Fox, Eve Frost, Richard Gaunt, Sarit Ghosh, Ishtiaq Gilkar, Anna Goodman, Steve Granier, Aleksandra Howell, Iqbal Hussain, Simon Hutchinson, Marie Imlach, Greg Irving, Nicholas Jacobsen, James Kennard, Umar Khan, Kyle Knox, Christopher Krasucki, Tom Law, Rem Lee, Nicola Lester, David Lewis, James Lunn, Claire I. Mackintosh, Mehul Mathukia, Patrick Moore, Seb Morton, Daniel Murphy, Rhiannon Nally, Chinonso Ndukauba, Olufunto Ogundapo, Henry Okeke, Amit Patel, Kavil Patel, Ruth Penfold, Satveer Poonian, Olajide Popoola, Alexander Pora, Vibhore Prasad, Rishabh Prasad, Omair Razzaq, Scot Richardson, Simon Royal, Afsana Safa, Satash Sehdev, Tamsin Sevenoaks, Divya Shah, Aadil Sheikh, Vanessa Short, Baljinder S Sidhu, Ivor Singh, Yusuf Soni, Chris Thalasselis, Pete Wilson, David Wingfield, Michael Wong, Maximillian N J Woodall, Nick Wooding, Sharon Woods, Joanna Yong, Francis Yongblah, Azhar Zafar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,421 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 194 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 11%
Other 21 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Student > Master 7 4%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 91 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 91 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4191. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,133
of 25,884,216 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#85
of 43,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39
of 483,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#1
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,884,216 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.