↓ Skip to main content

Toxicity of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles in Human Lung Cancer Cells

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Toxicology, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
314 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Toxicity of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles in Human Lung Cancer Cells
Published in
International Journal of Toxicology, November 2006
DOI 10.1080/10915810600959543
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

With the fast development of nanotechnology, the nanomaterials start to cause people's attention for potential toxic effect. In this paper, the cytotoxicity and oxidative stress caused by 20-nm cerium oxide (CeO2) nanoparticles in cultured human lung cancer cells was investigated. The sulforhodamine B method was employed to assess cell viability after exposure to 3.5, 10.5, and 23.3 microg/ml of CeO2 nanoparticles for 24, 48, and 72 h. Cell viability decreased significantly as a function of nanoparticle dose and exposure time. Indicators of oxidative stress and cytotoxicity, including total reactive oxygen species, glutathione, malondialdehyde, alpha-tocopherol, and lactate dehydrogenase, were quantitatively assessed. It is concluded from the results that free radicals generated by exposure to 3.5 to 23.3 microg/ml CeO2 nanoparticles produce significant oxidative stress in the cells, as reflected by reduced glutathione and alpha-tocopherol levels; the toxic effects of CeO2 nanoparticles are dose dependent and time dependent; elevated oxidative stress increases the production of malondialdehyde and lactate dehydrogenase, which are indicators of lipid peroxidation and cell membrane damage, respectively.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 4 1%
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 304 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 24%
Researcher 40 13%
Student > Master 37 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 51 16%
Unknown 73 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 51 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 11%
Engineering 24 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 7%
Materials Science 21 7%
Other 63 20%
Unknown 98 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,390,792
of 26,731,031 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Toxicology
#301
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,941
of 93,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Toxicology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,731,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them