↓ Skip to main content

Awake Craniotomy for Brain Tumor Resection

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Awake Craniotomy for Brain Tumor Resection
Published in
Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology, July 2013
DOI 10.1097/ana.0b013e318290c230
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Awake craniotomy (AC) has seen an expanded role in brain tumor surgery over the past few decades. AC allows intraoperative cortical mapping and the continuous assessment of neurophysiological parameters, which are otherwise unattainable under general anesthesia (GA). The ability of AC to analyze eloquent brain areas makes it a powerful method for reducing the risks associated with tumor resection, especially in motor and language cortex. We present a review of the literature to examine the benefits and limits of using AC over GA.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 119 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Other 18 15%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 33 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 45%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 40 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2025.
All research outputs
#4,760,513
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology
#164
of 1,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,322
of 206,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,347 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.