You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Variant Location Is a Novel Risk Factor for Individuals With Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Due to a Desmoplakin (DSP) Truncating Variant
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circgen.121.003672 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edgar T. Hoorntje, Charlotte Burns, Luisa Marsili, Ben Corden, Victoria N. Parikh, Gerard J. te Meerman, Belinda Gray, Ahmet Adiyaman, Richard D. Bagnall, Daniela Q.C.M. Barge-Schaapveld, Maarten P. van den Berg, Marianne Bootsma, Laurens P. Bosman, Gemma Correnti, Johan Duflou, Ruben N. Eppinga, Diane Fatkin, Michael Fietz, Eric Haan, Jan D.H. Jongbloed, Arnaud D. Hauer, Lien Lam, Freyja H.M. van Lint, Amrit Lota, Carlo Marcelis, Hugh J. McCarthy, Anneke M. van Mil, Rogier A. Oldenburg, Nicholas Pachter, R. Nils Planken, Chloe Reuter, Christopher Semsarian, Jasper J. van der Smagt, Tina Thompson, Jitendra Vohra, Paul G.A. Volders, Jaap I. van Waning, Nicola Whiffin, Arthur van den Wijngaard, Ahmad S. Amin, Arthur A.M. Wilde, Gijs van Woerden, Laura Yeates, Dominica Zentner, Euan A. Ashley, Matthew T. Wheeler, James S. Ware, J. Peter van Tintelen, Jodie Ingles |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 16% |
| Australia | 11 | 13% |
| United States | 11 | 13% |
| Spain | 7 | 9% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Romania | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 27 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 48% |
| Scientists | 22 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 31% |
| Researcher | 6 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 54% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Energy | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2023.
All research outputs
#908,822
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
#47
of 1,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,240
of 479,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.