You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A review on slow earthquakes in the Japan Trench
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40645-022-00528-w |
| Authors |
Tomoaki Nishikawa, Satoshi Ide, Takuya Nishimura |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 260 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 58 | 22% |
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| China | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 182 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 232 | 89% |
| Scientists | 24 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 35 | 42% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 17% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 28 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 182. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#224,948
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#4
of 606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,805
of 479,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.