↓ Skip to main content

物語の終焉法 : 『源氏物語』「とぞ本にはべめる」について、あるいは〈偽装の書承〉の考察(年間テーマ「区分・領域」)

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of The Association for Narrative Studies, March 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
物語の終焉法 : 『源氏物語』「とぞ本にはべめる」について、あるいは〈偽装の書承〉の考察(年間テーマ「区分・領域」)
Published in
The Journal of The Association for Narrative Studies, March 2001
DOI 10.24523/mgkk.1.0_46
Authors

原 豊二

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,606,066
of 25,515,042 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of The Association for Narrative Studies
#2
of 32 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,358
of 42,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of The Association for Narrative Studies
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,515,042 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one scored the same or higher as 30 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.