↓ Skip to main content

The Coevolution of Blue-Light Photoreception and Circadian Rhythms

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, August 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Coevolution of Blue-Light Photoreception and Circadian Rhythms
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, August 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00239-003-0038-8
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Sunlight is a primary source of energy for life. However, its UV component causes DNA damage. We suggest that the strong UV component of sunlight contributed to the selective pressure for the evolution of the specialized photoreceptor cryptochrome from photolyases involved in DNA repair and propose that early metazoans avoided irradiation by descending in the oceans during the daytime. We suggest further that it is not coincidental that blue-light photoreception evolved in an aquatic environment, since only blue light can penetrate to substantial depths in water. These photoreceptors were then also critical for sensing the decreased luminescence that signals the coming of night and the time to return to the surface. The oceans and the 24-h light-dark cycle therefore provided an optimal setting for an early evolutionary relationship between blue-light photoreception and circadian rhythmicity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 175 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 20%
Researcher 32 17%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Professor 11 6%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 33 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 14%
Neuroscience 9 5%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 38 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2020.
All research outputs
#10,540,461
of 32,071,872 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#560
of 1,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,396
of 71,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#12
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,071,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.