You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interlaboratory Evaluation of Multiple LC–MS/MS Methods and a Commercial ELISA Method for Determination of Tetrodotoxin in Oysters and Mussels
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of AOAC International, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jaoacint/qsad006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew D Turner, Karl J Dean, Monika Dhanji-Rapkova, Sonia Dall’Ara, Florella Pino, Claire McVey, Simon Haughey, Natasha Logan, Christopher Elliott, Ana Gago-Martinez, Jose Manuel Leao, Jorge Giraldez, Ryan Gibbs, Krista Thomas, Ruth Perez-Calderon, Dermot Faulkner, Hugh McEneny, Veronique Savar, Damien Reveillon, Philipp Hess, Fabiola Arevalo, J Pablo Lamas, Eva Cagide, Mercedes Alvarez, Alvaro Antelo, Mirjam D Klijnstra, Michalina Oplatowska-Stachowiak, Tim Kleintjens, Nermin Sajic, Michael J Boundy, Benjamin H Maskrey, D Tim Harwood, Jesús M González Jartín, Amparo Alfonso, Luis Botana |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 55% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#6,839,506
of 24,325,299 outputs
Outputs from Journal of AOAC International
#269
of 1,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,317
of 446,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of AOAC International
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,325,299 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,266 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them