You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Linking early-life bilingualism and cognitive advantage in older adulthood
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurobiology of Aging, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2022.12.005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tommaso Ballarini, Elizabeth Kuhn, Sandra Röske, Slawek Altenstein, Claudia Bartels, Friederike Buchholz, Katharina Buerger, Peter Dechent, Laura Dobisch, Michael Ewers, Klaus Fliessbach, Silka Dawn Freiesleben, Ingo Frommann, Tatjana Gabelin, Wenzel Glanz, Doreen Görß, John Dylan Haynes, Enise I. Incesoy, Daniel Janowitz, Ingo Kilimann, Luca Kleineidam, Xenia Kobeleva, Christoph Laske, Andrea Lohse, Franziska Maier, Matthias H. Munk, Robert Perneczky, Oliver Peters, Josef Priller, Boris-Stephan Rauchmann, Nina Roy, Klaus Scheffler, Anja Schneider, Björn H. Schott, Annika Spottke, Eike Jakob Spruth, Stefan Teipel, Jens Wiltfang, Steffen Wolfsgruber, Emrah Düzel, Frank Jessen, Michael Wagner, DELCODE study group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 30% |
| Germany | 3 | 8% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 62% |
| Scientists | 8 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 5 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 11% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 296. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#120,252
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Neurobiology of Aging
#15
of 4,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,256
of 485,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurobiology of Aging
#2
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 485,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.