↓ Skip to main content

Boundary objects, power, and learning: The matter of developing sustainable practice in organizations

Overview of attention for article published in Management Learning, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Boundary objects, power, and learning: The matter of developing sustainable practice in organizations
Published in
Management Learning, November 2016
DOI 10.1177/1350507616677199
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 30%
Researcher 11 10%
Lecturer 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Other 5 4%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 30 26%
Social Sciences 18 16%
Psychology 4 4%
Computer Science 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 30 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,873,262
of 28,108,529 outputs
Outputs from Management Learning
#208
of 656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,150
of 414,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Management Learning
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,108,529 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.