You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing Analysis Blinding With Preregistration in the Many-Analysts Religion Project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1177/25152459221128319 |
| Authors |
Alexandra Sarafoglou, Suzanne Hoogeveen, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 13% |
| Germany | 5 | 5% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 3% |
| Austria | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 34 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 54 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 41 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 50% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 3 | 38% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2023.
All research outputs
#643,681
of 25,564,614 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
#48
of 215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,655
of 476,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,564,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 71.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them