You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
持続的腎機能代替療法(CRRT)施行中の全身管理 抗凝固能管理および栄養管理
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Japan Society for Blood Purification in Critical Care, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.34325/jsbpcc.4.1_9 |
| Authors |
中永 士師明 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,670,888
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society for Blood Purification in Critical Care
#2
of 3 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,971
of 422,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society for Blood Purification in Critical Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one scored the same or higher as 1 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them