You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evolution tumour models paving the way for understanding oral carcinogenesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jop.13402 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roberta Rayra Martins‐Chaves, Rubens Signoretti Oliveira Silva, Thaís dos Santos Fontes Pereira, Felipe Paiva Fonseca, Ricardo Santiago Gomez |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 33% |
| Professor | 1 | 17% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,428,335
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine
#78
of 962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,721
of 474,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 962 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.