You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Natural cubic splines for the analysis of Alzheimer's clinical trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmaceutical Statistics, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/pst.2285 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael C. Donohue, Oliver Langford, Philip S. Insel, Christopher H. van Dyck, Ronald C. Petersen, Suzanne Craft, Gopalan Sethuraman, Rema Raman, Paul S. Aisen, For the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 63% |
| Scientists | 8 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 43% |
| Other | 4 | 29% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 3 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 21% |
| Engineering | 2 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,552,271
of 25,375,376 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Statistics
#8
of 580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,918
of 478,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Statistics
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,375,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 580 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.