↓ Skip to main content

Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided vs Computed Tomography–Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Oncology, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 3,345)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
96 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
189 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided vs Computed Tomography–Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
Published in
JAMA Oncology, March 2023
DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.6558
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amar U. Kishan, Ting Martin, James M. Lamb, Maria Casado, Holly Wilhalme, Daniel A. Low, Ke Sheng, Sahil Sharma, Nicholas G. Nickols, Jonathan Pham, Yingli Yang, Yu Gao, John Neylon, Vincent Basehart, Minsong Cao, Michael L. Steinberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 189 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 10 10%
Other 8 8%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 43 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 22%
Unspecified 10 10%
Physics and Astronomy 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 46 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 836. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#22,209
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Oncology
#33
of 3,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#638
of 429,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Oncology
#1
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 84.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.