↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive multi-omic profiling of somatic mutations in malformations of cortical development

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
26 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
94 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive multi-omic profiling of somatic mutations in malformations of cortical development
Published in
Nature Genetics, January 2023
DOI 10.1038/s41588-022-01276-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Changuk Chung, Xiaoxu Yang, Taejeong Bae, Keng Ioi Vong, Swapnil Mittal, Catharina Donkels, H. Westley Phillips, Zhen Li, Ashley P. L. Marsh, Martin W. Breuss, Laurel L. Ball, Camila Araújo Bernardino Garcia, Renee D. George, Jing Gu, Mingchu Xu, Chelsea Barrows, Kiely N. James, Valentina Stanley, Anna S. Nidhiry, Sami Khoury, Gabrielle Howe, Emily Riley, Xin Xu, Brett Copeland, Yifan Wang, Se Hoon Kim, Hoon-Chul Kang, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage, Carola A. Haas, Horst Urbach, Marco Prinz, David D. Limbrick, Christina A. Gurnett, Matthew D. Smyth, Shifteh Sattar, Mark Nespeca, David D. Gonda, Katsumi Imai, Yukitoshi Takahashi, Hsin-Hung Chen, Jin-Wu Tsai, Valerio Conti, Renzo Guerrini, Orrin Devinsky, Wilson A. Silva, Helio R. Machado, Gary W. Mathern, Alexej Abyzov, Sara Baldassari, Stéphanie Baulac, Joseph G. Gleeson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 30 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 12 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 30 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 247. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2023.
All research outputs
#153,065
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#220
of 7,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,053
of 479,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#4
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.