↓ Skip to main content

Breaking Up Prolonged Sitting to Improve Cardiometabolic Risk: Dose–Response Analysis of a Randomized Crossover Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 7,090)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
285 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
twitter
230 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Breaking Up Prolonged Sitting to Improve Cardiometabolic Risk: Dose–Response Analysis of a Randomized Crossover Trial
Published in
Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, January 2023
DOI 10.1249/mss.0000000000003109
Pubmed ID
Authors

ANDREA T. DURAN, CIARAN P. FRIEL, MARIA A. SERAFINI, IPEK ENSARI, YING KUEN CHEUNG, KEITH M. DIAZ

Abstract

Sedentary time is ubiquitous in developed nations and is associated with deleterious health outcomes. Physical activity guidelines recommend reductions in sedentary time, however quantitative guidelines that inform how often and how long sedentary time should be interrupted have not been provided. The purpose of this study was to examine the acute effects of multiple doses of a sedentary break intervention on cardiometabolic risk factors, concurrently evaluating efficacy of varying frequencies and durations of sedentary breaks. In a randomized cross-over study, middle- and older-aged adults (n = 11) completed the following 8-hour conditions on five separate days: 1 uninterrupted sedentary (control) condition and 4 acute (experimental) trials that entailed different sedentary break frequency/duration combinations: every 30 min for 1 min, every 30 min for 5 min, every 60 min for 1 min, and every 60 min for 5 min. Sedentary breaks entailed light-intensity walking. Glucose and blood pressure (BP) were measured every 15 and 60 min, respectively. Compared to control, glucose incremental area under the curve was significantly attenuated only for the every 30 min for 5 min dose (-11.8[4.7]; p = 0.017). All sedentary break doses yielded significant net decreases in systolic BP from baseline compared to control (p < 0.05). The largest reductions in systolic BP were observed for the every 60 min for 1 min (-5.2[1.4] mmHg) and every 30 min for 5 min (-4.3[1.4] mmHg) doses. The present study provides important information concerning efficacious sedentary break doses. Higher frequency and longer duration breaks (every 30 min for 5 min) should be considered when targeting glycemic responses, while lower doses may be sufficient for BP lowering.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 230 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 5 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 12 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2357. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,480
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#1
of 7,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113
of 479,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#1
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.