↓ Skip to main content

The need for an integrated multi‐OMICs approach in microbiome science in the food system

Overview of attention for article published in Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science & Food Safety, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The need for an integrated multi‐OMICs approach in microbiome science in the food system
Published in
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science & Food Safety, January 2023
DOI 10.1111/1541-4337.13103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilario Ferrocino, Kalliopi Rantsiou, Ryan McClure, Tanja Kostic, Rafael Soares Correa de Souza, Lene Lange, Jamie FitzGerald, Aicha Kriaa, Paul Cotter, Emmanuelle Maguin, Bettina Schelkle, Michael Schloter, Gabriele Berg, Angela Sessitsch, Luca Cocolin, The MicrobiomeSupport Consortium

Abstract

Microbiome science as an interdisciplinary research field has evolved rapidly over the past two decades, becoming a popular topic not only in the scientific community and among the general public, but also in the food industry due to the growing demand for microbiome-based technologies that provide added-value solutions. Microbiome research has expanded in the context of food systems, strongly driven by methodological advances in different -omics fields that leverage our understanding of microbial diversity and function. However, managing and integrating different complex -omics layers are still challenging. Within the Coordinated Support Action MicrobiomeSupport (https://www.microbiomesupport.eu/), a project supported by the European Commission, the workshop "Metagenomics, Metaproteomics and Metabolomics: the need for data integration in microbiome research" gathered 70 participants from different microbiome research fields relevant to food systems, to discuss challenges in microbiome research and to promote a switch from microbiome-based descriptive studies to functional studies, elucidating the biology and interactive roles of microbiomes in food systems. A combination of technologies is proposed. This will reduce the biases resulting from each individual technology and result in a more comprehensive view of the biological system as a whole. Although combinations of different datasets are still rare, advanced bioinformatics tools and artificial intelligence approaches can contribute to understanding, prediction, and management of the microbiome, thereby providing the basis for the improvement of food quality and safety.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Researcher 9 13%
Unspecified 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 29 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 16%
Unspecified 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 38 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,621,186
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science & Food Safety
#121
of 965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,566
of 479,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science & Food Safety
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.