↓ Skip to main content

Homo floresiensis and Homo luzonensis are not temporally exceptional relative to Homo erectus

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Quaternary Science, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 810)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
83 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Homo floresiensis and Homo luzonensis are not temporally exceptional relative to Homo erectus
Published in
Journal of Quaternary Science, January 2023
DOI 10.1002/jqs.3498
Authors

David L. Roberts, Ivan Jarić, Stephen J. Lycett, Dylan Flicker, Alastair Key

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 2 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#778,039
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Quaternary Science
#35
of 810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,794
of 493,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Quaternary Science
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 493,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.