You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
大腿骨近位部骨折術後例における杖歩行の可否・歩行速度を決定する可変的要因の検討
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Physical Therapy Japan, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.15063/rigaku.kj00009692645 |
| Authors |
川端 悠士, 澄川 泰弘, 林 真美, 武市 理史, 後藤 圭太, 藤森 里美, 小原 成美 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,093,049
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Physical Therapy Japan
#14
of 289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,555
of 266,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Therapy Japan
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 289 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them