Transcriptomics for Clinical and Experimental Biology Research: Hang on a Seq

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Genetics, January 2023

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 62 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 48 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 158 X posts from 62 X users, with an upper bound of 251,803 followers.

@jmdubs6 @ImmunoFever @plasmidsaurus Low quality, drop out ridden RNAseq is just contaminating science with false "specific" gene expression Some reason why, here: https://t.co/0X61hYF6Qo

@MariosGeorgakis Note that most RNAseq data is devoid of reliable canonical ncRNA measures due to the failures of the cDNA library step https://t.co/FqA8tmdTQo intergenic DNA regulatory elements even trickier.

@fumikawano We have repeatedly shown (in metabolic tissues) claims of specific (eg pancreas) lncRNA are false We've shown that RNAseq produce a small at random sub sample of what the tissue actually expresses - muscle example here https://t.co/FqA8tmdTQ…

@blekhman Did granny mention early Illumina short read seq scammed its way to "bigger unbiased coverage"? Oh yeh and the QC consortium in 2016 reported transcript counts as "genes". https://t.co/0X61hYF6Qo

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 154 additional X posts.