You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk Factors for Increased Stent-associated Symptoms Following Ureteroscopy for Urinary Stones: Results From STENTS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Urology, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1097/ju.0000000000003183 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan D. Harper, Alana C. Desai, Naim M. Maalouf, Hongqiu Yang, Jodi A. Antonelli, Gregory E. Tasian, H. Henry Lai, Peter P. Reese, Michele Curatolo, Ziya Kirkali, Hussein R. Al-Khalidi, Hunter Wessells, Charles D. Scales, Peter P. Reese, Gregory E. Tasian, Justin Ziemba, Emily Funsten, Adam Mussell, Rebecca McCune, Salima Shah, Arushi Jain, Antoine Selman-Fermin, Naim M. Maalouf, Jodi A. Antonelli, Brett A. Johnson, Margaret S. Pearle, Linda A. Baker, Brooke Piskator, Joyce Obiaro, Cynthia Rangel, Martinez Hill, Jonathan D. Harper, Hunter Wessells, Michele Curatolo, Todd Edwards, Mathew Sorensen, Robert Sweet, Tristan Baxter, Holly Covert, Elsa Ayala, Lisa Flint, Grace Cho, Grace Marshall, Alana C. Desai, H. Henry Lai, Kefu Du, Susan Mueller, Linda Black, Aleksandra Klim, Charles D. Scales, Hussein R. Al-Khalidi, Amy Corneli, Bryce Reeve, Kevin Weinfurt, Hongqiu Yang, Davy Andersen, Laura Johnson, Andrew Dodd, Omar Thompson, Carrie Dombeck, Kevin McKenna, Teri Swezey, Ziya Kirkali, Christopher Mullins |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 58% |
| Mexico | 2 | 11% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 71% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 18% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,265,699
of 34,351,437 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Urology
#2,097
of 21,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,740
of 527,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Urology
#20
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,351,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 527,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.