↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Biomarker Exploration of Rituximab plus CHOP Therapy in Real-World Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients.

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Laboratory, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular Biomarker Exploration of Rituximab plus CHOP Therapy in Real-World Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients.
Published in
Clinical Laboratory, January 2023
DOI 10.7754/clin.lab.2022.211124
Pubmed ID
Authors

HongBiao Wang, YingCheng Lin, ZhiFeng Li, YueRong Wu, ZhengYuan Yang, ShiHua Gao, FangFang Lin

Abstract

Presently, several classification methods are based on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but its clinical application has not yet been testified in Asian populations. Twenty-five DLBCL patients were subjected to second-generation gene sequencing (NGS), and retrospective analysis of clinical features of the patients was to explore genotyping and survival prognosis biomarkers. The prevalent mutant genes in DLBCL patients cover myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) (40%), TP53 (32%), B-cell translocation gene 2 (BTG2) (28%), PIM1 (28%), and CREB-binding protein (CREBBP) (24%) in this study. The classical International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores were associated with progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 7.52, 95% CI 1.51 - 37.6, p = 0.00393) via univariate analysis. Furthermore, patients with ETS-variant gene 6 (ETV6) (HR: 5.1, 95% CI 0.927 - 28.1, p = 0.0371), platelet-derived growth factor receptor A (PDGFRA) (HR: 4.29, 95% CI 0.824 - 22.3, p = 0.0594), platelet-derived growth factor receptor B (PDGFRB) (HR: 10.8, 95% CI 0.979 - 119, p = 0.0149) was distinctively correlated with poor PFS except for the IPI score. Nevertheless, the mutation of PDGFRA/B gene was not distinct in further multivariate analysis (PFS: HR: 2.72, 95% CI 0.52 - 14.23, p = 0.2369). Additionally, better survival prognosis was in DLBCL patients who did not progress within 12 months (POD12). Ultimately, caspase recruitment domain 11 (CARD11) gene mutations were enriched in patients with primary intranodal tumors, but the prognostic relevance was not discovered. ETV6 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)A/B gene mutations are supposed to be potential biomarkers for the prognosis of DLBCL patients via the statistical analysis of this small sample, and POD12 is also expected to be an effective endpoint for efficacy assessment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2023.
All research outputs
#15,322,694
of 23,565,002 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Laboratory
#136
of 811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,099
of 437,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Laboratory
#5
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,565,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 811 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.