↓ Skip to main content

The left temporal pole is important for retrieving words for unique concrete entities

Overview of attention for article published in Aphasiology, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The left temporal pole is important for retrieving words for unique concrete entities
Published in
Aphasiology, July 2009
DOI 10.1080/02687030802586498
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 84 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 29%
Researcher 20 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Master 5 6%
Professor 4 4%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 29%
Neuroscience 18 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Linguistics 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 22 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2023.
All research outputs
#15,857,708
of 23,565,002 outputs
Outputs from Aphasiology
#499
of 661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,668
of 111,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aphasiology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,565,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.