| Title |
ESSENTIAL COLD URTICARIA. A POTENTIAL CAUSE OF DEATH WHILE SWIMMING.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, September 1964
|
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C SIGAL, J C MITCHELL |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 426. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#67,284
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#125
of 9,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2
of 1,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.