You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of fact‐checking warning labels and social endorsement cues on climate change fake news credibility and engagement on social media
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.1111/jasp.12959 |
Authors |
Timo K. Koch, Lena Frischlich, Eva Lermer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 24% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 15 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 15 | 52% |
Members of the public | 12 | 41% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 8% |
Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
Researcher | 4 | 8% |
Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 19% |
Unknown | 25 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 5 | 9% |
Unspecified | 4 | 8% |
Psychology | 4 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 6% |
Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 26 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,143,970
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Social Psychology
#309
of 1,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,659
of 474,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Social Psychology
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.