↓ Skip to main content

Is postexercise hypotension a method‐dependent phenomenon in chronic stroke? A crossover randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Physiology & Functional Imaging, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is postexercise hypotension a method‐dependent phenomenon in chronic stroke? A crossover randomized controlled trial
Published in
Clinical Physiology & Functional Imaging, January 2023
DOI 10.1111/cpf.12812
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guilherme F. Fonseca, André C. Michalski, Arthur S. Ferreira, Victor A. B. Costa, Renato Massaferri, Paulo Farinatti, Felipe A. Cunha

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Unspecified 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#14,488,785
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Physiology & Functional Imaging
#363
of 697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,840
of 472,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Physiology & Functional Imaging
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.