↓ Skip to main content

Current relevance of pharmacogenetics in immunomodulation treatment for Crohn's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Current relevance of pharmacogenetics in immunomodulation treatment for Crohn's disease
Published in
Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, September 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07220.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

No drug therapy is completely risk free, and the costs associated with non-response and adverse effects can exceed the cost of the therapy. The ultimate goal of pharmacogenetic research is to find robust genetic predictors of drug response that enable the development of prospective genetic tests to reliably identify patients at risk of non-response or of developing an adverse effect prior to the drug being prescribed. Currently, thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) deficiency is the only pharmacogenetic factor that is prospectively assessed before azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine immunomodulation is commenced in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). As yet no other inherited determinant of drug response has made the transition from bench to bedside for the management of this disease. In this review we summarize what is known about TPMT deficiency and explore whether there is evidence to support a role of other genetic polymorphisms in predicting the response of CD patients to thiopurine drugs, methotrexate, and anti-tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) therapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 4%
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 83 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 17 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2015.
All research outputs
#11,458,546
of 34,360,889 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
#1,911
of 4,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,379
of 226,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
#9
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.