You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
腱板修復術により腱板構成筋群の筋萎縮,脂肪浸潤は改善しうるか?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Katakansetsu, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.11296/katakansetsu.38.810 |
| Authors |
濱野 哲敬, 山本 敦史, 小林 勉, 設楽 仁, 一ノ瀬 剛, 下山 大輔, 佐々木 毅志, 高岸 憲二, 角田 陽平, 大澤 敏久 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2023.
All research outputs
#16,376,857
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Katakansetsu
#9
of 54 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,187
of 371,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Katakansetsu
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them