↓ Skip to main content

CEERS Spectroscopic Confirmation of NIRCam-selected z ≳ 8 Galaxy Candidates with JWST/NIRSpec: Initial Characterization of Their Properties

Overview of attention for article published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 7,300)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
353 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
25 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CEERS Spectroscopic Confirmation of NIRCam-selected z ≳ 8 Galaxy Candidates with JWST/NIRSpec: Initial Characterization of Their Properties
Published in
The Astrophysical Journal Letters, June 2023
DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/acd2d9
Authors

Seiji Fujimoto, Pablo Arrabal Haro, Mark Dickinson, Steven L. Finkelstein, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, Rebecca L. Larson, Denis Burgarella, Micaela B. Bagley, Peter Behroozi, Katherine Chworowsky, Michaela Hirschmann, Jonathan R. Trump, Stephen M. Wilkins, L. Y. Aaron Yung, Anton M. Koekemoer, Casey Papovich, Nor Pirzkal, Henry C. Ferguson, Adriano Fontana, Norman A. Grogin, Andrea Grazian, Lisa J. Kewley, Dale D. Kocevski, Jennifer M. Lotz, Laura Pentericci, Swara Ravindranath, Rachel S. Somerville, Stephen M. Wilkins, Ricardo O. Amorín, Bren E. Backhaus, Antonello Calabrò, Caitlin M. Casey, M. C. Cooper, Vital Fernández, Maximilien Franco, Mauro Giavalisco, Nimish P. Hathi, Santosh Harish, Taylor A. Hutchison, Kartheik G. Iyer, Intae Jung, Ray A. Lucas, Jorge A. Zavala

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Researcher 5 15%
Unspecified 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Professor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 19 58%
Unspecified 4 12%
Unknown 10 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2702. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,721
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from The Astrophysical Journal Letters
#5
of 7,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67
of 388,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Astrophysical Journal Letters
#1
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.