↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users
patent
7 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Allogeneic Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis via Intravenous Delivery (AETHER) A Phase I Safety Clinical Trial
Published in
CHEST, November 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.061
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Despite recent FDA approval of two new drugs for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), curative therapies remain elusive and mortality remains high. Pre-clinical and clinical data support the safety of human mesenchymal stem cells as a potential novel therapy for this fatal condition. The AETHER trial was the first study designed to evaluate the safety of a single infusion of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Nine patients with mild to moderate IPF were sequentially assigned to one of three cohorts and dosed with a single intravenous infusion of 20, 100, or 200 x 10(6) human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells per infusion from young, unrelated, male donors. All baseline patient data were reviewed by a multidisciplinary study team to ensure accurate diagnosis. The primary endpoint was the incidence (at week four post infusion) of treatment emergent serious adverse events, defined as the composite of: death, non-fatal pulmonary embolism, stroke, hospitalization for worsening dyspnea, and clinically significant laboratory test abnormalities. Safety was assessed until week 60, and additionally 28 days thereafter. Secondary efficacy endpoints were exploratory and measured disease progression. No treatment-emergent serious adverse events were reported. Two non-treatment related deaths occurred due to progression of IPF (disease worsening and/or acute exacerbation). By 60 weeks post-infusion, there was a 3.0% mean decline in % predicted FVC and 5.4% mean decline in % predicted DLCO. Data from this trial support the safety of a single infusion of hMSC in patients with mild-moderate IPF.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 210 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Other 12 6%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 87 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 1%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 99 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2026.
All research outputs
#2,434,980
of 34,778,077 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#2,307
of 18,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,429
of 454,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#30
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,778,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.