You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnosis of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease: International MOGAD Panel proposed criteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Neurology, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1474-4422(22)00431-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brenda Banwell, Jeffrey L Bennett, Romain Marignier, Ho Jin Kim, Fabienne Brilot, Eoin P Flanagan, Sudarshini Ramanathan, Patrick Waters, Silvia Tenembaum, Jennifer S Graves, Tanuja Chitnis, Alexander U Brandt, Cheryl Hemingway, Rinze Neuteboom, Lekha Pandit, Markus Reindl, Albert Saiz, Douglas Kazutoshi Sato, Kevin Rostasy, Friedemann Paul, Sean J Pittock, Kazuo Fujihara, Jacqueline Palace |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 330 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40 | 12% |
| Spain | 25 | 8% |
| Japan | 16 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 4% |
| Mexico | 10 | 3% |
| Australia | 9 | 3% |
| Italy | 8 | 2% |
| India | 7 | 2% |
| Chile | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 14% |
| Unknown | 151 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 247 | 75% |
| Scientists | 42 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 34 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 286 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 33 | 12% |
| Researcher | 33 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 17% |
| Unknown | 106 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 37 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 28 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Unknown | 112 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 580. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#41,090
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Neurology
#33
of 4,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,130
of 476,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Neurology
#2
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.