↓ Skip to main content

Human parental effort and environmental risk

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
citeulike
13 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Human parental effort and environmental risk
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, October 2006
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2006.3690
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Parental investment decisions depend on multiple factors, including the extent that parental care benefits offspring. Humans should show reduced parental effort in environments where parenting cannot improve offspring survival. Data from the standard cross-cultural sample are used to test this prediction. The results show that maternal care was inversely associated with famine and warfare, and also showed a quadratic association with pathogen stress, increasing as pathogen stress increased to moderate levels, but decreasing at higher levels. Age at weaning showed a similar quadratic relation with pathogens. The curvilinear associations between parental effort and pathogen stress may reflect that the saturation point of parental care is a function of environmental hazards. Paternal involvement was also inversely related to pathogen stress. The association between pathogens and paternal involvement was partially mediated by polygyny. In sum, maternal and paternal care appears to have somewhat different relations with environmental hazards, presumably owing to sex-specific tradeoffs in reproductive effort.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 2%
United States 4 2%
France 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Senegal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 238 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 28%
Researcher 36 14%
Student > Master 30 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Professor 15 6%
Other 45 18%
Unknown 34 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 24%
Social Sciences 53 21%
Psychology 44 17%
Arts and Humanities 17 7%
Environmental Science 6 2%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 46 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2018.
All research outputs
#9,876,195
of 28,860,665 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#8,553
of 11,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,560
of 93,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#27
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,860,665 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.