↓ Skip to main content

Robustness and dynamicity of functional networks in phantom sound

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroImage, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Robustness and dynamicity of functional networks in phantom sound
Published in
NeuroImage, April 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.033
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Phantom sound perception is the perception of a sound in the absence of a corresponding external sound source. It is a common symptom for which no treatment exists. Gaining a better understanding of its pathophysiology by applying network science might help in identifying targets in the brain for neuromodulatory approaches to treat this elusive symptom. Brain networks are commonly organized as functional modules which have a densely connected core network coupled to a communally-organized peripheral network. The core network is called the rich club network and the peripheral network is divided into the feeder and local networks. In current study, we investigate the effects of virtual lesions on the endogenous dynamics, complexity and robustness of the remaining brain. It is hypothesized that depending on whether nodes are functionally central to the network or not, the robustness and dynamics of the network change when a lesion in introduced. We therefore investigate the effect of introducing a virtual focal lesion randomly to different nodes in the tinnitus network and contrast it to the effect of specifically targeting the nodes of the rich-club, feeder and local nodes in patients experiencing a phantom sound (i.e. tinnitus). The tinnitus and control networks were computed from the source-localized EEG of 311 tinnitus patients and 256 control subjects. The results of the current study indicate that both the tinnitus and control networks are robust to the attack on random and rich club nodes, but are drastically modified when attacked from the periphery, especially while targeting the feeder hubs. In both the tinnitus and control networks, feeder nodes were found to have a higher betweenness centrality value than the rich club nodes. This shows that the feeders have a larger influence on the information transmission through the brain than the rich club nodes, by transferring information from the peripheral communities to the core. Further, evidence for the theoretical model of a multimodal in tinnitus network is also presented showing that the tinnitus network is divided into individual, separable modules each possibly encoding a different aspect of tinnitus. The current study alludes to the concept that the efficient modification of the tinnitus network is theoretically possible by disconnecting the individual communities from the core of the pathological network.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 7 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Engineering 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 17 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2016.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#9,480
of 12,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,540
of 313,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#162
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.