Peer Review in a General Medical Research Journal Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Network Open, January 2023

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs: 1 blog
twitter: 29 X users

facebook: 1 Facebook page
reddit: 1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley: 12 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 36 X posts from 29 X users, with an upper bound of 184,014 followers.

RT @Fiona_M_Russell: This study found that peer review had not deteriorated during covid- good news But still plenty of papers published t…

This study found that peer review had not deteriorated during covid- good news But still plenty of papers published that shouldn’t have been Still, the big 🚩 are those that peddle misinformation thru alternative nonpeer reviewed means- SM, websites etc…

Researchers from @MassGeneralNews and colleagues find peer review process continued to function during COVID-19 pandemic, in a @JAMANetworkopen study. https://t.co/Fb9brjChQX https://t.co/DjAjdVKWIH

RT @royperlis: today in @JAMANetworkOpen ... how did peer review process change in the first 18 months of the pandemic? answer might surpr…

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 32 additional X posts.