Small lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL/SLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) usually are distinctly different in regard to clinical presentation, morphology, immunophenotype and molecular/genetic findings. In spite of this, select cases may show overlapping characteristics and represent a diagnostic challenge. Recently LEF1 staining was identified as a fairly characteristic finding in CLL/SLL, with positivity identified in up to 95% of cases. LEF1 staining has not been reported as being present in cases of MCL, making this stain a useful tool in distinguishing these diagnoses. We identified an index case of MCL with cyclin D1 expression and the presence of the typical t(11;14) IGH-CCND1, which expressed LEF1. Subsequently, we assessed LEF1 immunohistochemical staining in a series of 23 cases of MCL, as confirmed by staining for cyclin D1 and/or SOX11. We found expression present in one additional case, and evaluated some published literature suggesting a frequency of 4-9% expression of LEF1 by MCL. LEF1 expression by immunohistochemistry in MCL is unusual but can be seen rarely, and could represent a potential diagnostic pitfall.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,848,776
of 34,413,214 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Diagnostic Pathology
#39
of 931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,178
of 451,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Diagnostic Pathology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,413,214 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
