↓ Skip to main content

MFR-DTA: a multi-functional and robust model for predicting drug–target binding affinity and region

Overview of attention for article published in Bioinformatics, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
MFR-DTA: a multi-functional and robust model for predicting drug–target binding affinity and region
Published in
Bioinformatics, January 2023
DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad056
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Recently, deep learning has become the mainstream methodology for Drug-Target binding Affinity (DTA) prediction. However, two deficiencies of the existing methods restrict their practical applications. On the one hand, most existing methods ignore the individual information of sequence elements, resulting in poor sequence feature representations. On the other hand, without prior biological knowledge, the prediction of drug-target binding regions based on attention weights of a deep neural network could be difficult to verify, which may bring adverse interference to biological researchers. We propose a novel Multi-Functional and Robust Drug-Target binding Affinity prediction (MFR-DTA) method to address the above issues. Specifically, we design a new biological sequence feature extraction block, namely BioMLP, that assists the model in extracting individual features of sequence elements. Then, we propose a new Elem-feature fusion block to refine the extracted features. After that, we construct a Mix-Decoder block that extracts drug-target interaction information and predicts their binding regions simultaneously. Last, we evaluate MFR-DTA on two benchmarks consistently with the existing methods and propose a new dataset, sc-PDB, to better measure the accuracy of binding region prediction. We also visualise some samples to demonstrate the locations of their binding sites and the predicted multi-scale interaction regions. The proposed method achieves excellent performance on these datasets, demonstrating its merits and superiority over the state-of-the-art methods. https://github.com/JU-HuaY/MFR. Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 12%
Professor 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 29%
Unspecified 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 9 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#22,699,678
of 27,791,073 outputs
Outputs from Bioinformatics
#10,313
of 11,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#370,743
of 497,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioinformatics
#140
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,791,073 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 497,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.