You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
地域在住中高年者を対象としたプレフレイルからロバストへの改善に関連する基本チェックリストの各領域の特徴
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Geriatric Therapy, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.57270/jgts.2022_013 |
| Authors |
釜﨑 大志郎, 大田尾 浩, 八谷 瑞紀, 久保 温子, 大川 裕行, 藤原 和彦, 坂本 飛鳥, 下木原 俊, 韓 侊熙, 丸田 道雄, 田平 隆行 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,507,353
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Geriatric Therapy
#14
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,304
of 479,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Geriatric Therapy
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one scored the same or higher as 8 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.