You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring the genetics of rhythmic perception and musical engagement in the Vanderbilt Online Musicality Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1111/nyas.14964 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel E. Gustavson, Peyton L. Coleman, Youjia Wang, Rachana Nitin, Lauren E. Petty, Catherine T. Bush, Miriam A. Mosing, Laura W. Wesseldijk, Fredrik Ullén, 23 and Me Research Team, Jennifer E. Below, Nancy J. Cox, Reyna L. Gordon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 38% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 31% |
| Psychology | 2 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,873,860
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#677
of 11,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,293
of 474,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.