↓ Skip to main content

The Relationship between Status Consumption and Materialism: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Chinese, Mexican, and American Student

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 193)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Relationship between Status Consumption and Materialism: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Chinese, Mexican, and American Student
Published in
Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, December 2015
DOI 10.1080/10696679.1997.11501750
Authors

Jacqueline K. Eastman, Bill Fredenberger, David Campbell, Stephen Calvert

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 158 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Researcher 6 4%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 40 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 68 42%
Social Sciences 21 13%
Psychology 12 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 39 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,140,196
of 34,536,218 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice
#31
of 193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,466
of 444,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice
#7
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,536,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.