↓ Skip to main content

Hunting and processing of straight-tusked elephants 125.000 years ago: Implications for Neanderthal behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Science Advances, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
117 news outlets
blogs
15 blogs
twitter
230 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hunting and processing of straight-tusked elephants 125.000 years ago: Implications for Neanderthal behavior
Published in
Science Advances, February 2023
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.add8186
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabine Gaudzinski-Windheuser, Lutz Kindler, Katharine MacDonald, Wil Roebroeks

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 230 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Unspecified 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 17 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 10%
Unspecified 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 21 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#13,600
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#194
of 12,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#405
of 477,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#5
of 497 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 497 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.