You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hunting and processing of straight-tusked elephants 125.000 years ago: Implications for Neanderthal behavior
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science Advances, February 2023
|
DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.add8186 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sabine Gaudzinski-Windheuser, Lutz Kindler, Katharine MacDonald, Wil Roebroeks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 230 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 17 | 7% |
Japan | 16 | 7% |
Germany | 12 | 5% |
Spain | 9 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 3% |
France | 5 | 2% |
Australia | 3 | 1% |
Canada | 3 | 1% |
Czechia | 3 | 1% |
Other | 21 | 9% |
Unknown | 134 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 192 | 83% |
Scientists | 31 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 27% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
Unspecified | 4 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 17% |
Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 17 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 13% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 10% |
Unspecified | 4 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 21 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#13,600
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#194
of 12,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#405
of 477,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#5
of 497 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 497 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.