↓ Skip to main content

Occupational therapy in adults with chronic respiratory conditions: A scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Occupational therapy in adults with chronic respiratory conditions: A scoping review
Published in
Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, February 2023
DOI 10.1111/1440-1630.12861
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Chronic respiratory diseases have a clear impact on occupational performance and engagement. Although occupational therapists have long provided services to this population, evidence regarding the unique role and true impact of occupational therapy is emerging. The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the range, context, and outcomes of occupational therapy services for adults with chronic respiratory conditions. A scoping review guided by the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley was completed. To be included articles needed to be peer reviewed primary studies published in English between 2000 and September 2022 describing occupational therapy service delivery for people with chronic respiratory conditions. Twenty-six articles met inclusion criteria including 12 cohort studies, seven randomised control trials, four qualitative, two case reports, and one service evaluation. Interventions were targeted at body functions and structures (n = 18), activities and participation (n = 17), and environmental factors (n = 14). Ten studies reported impacts of occupational therapy ranging from physiological responses through to quality of life. Occupational therapy service delivery is common for this population, often occurring as part of multidisciplinary programs, and is inclusive of a range of assessments and interventions. Further details in future primary research are needed to describe the mode and unique occupational nature of service delivery.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 19 58%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Unspecified 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 20 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2023.
All research outputs
#17,226,671
of 25,295,968 outputs
Outputs from Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
#530
of 728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,149
of 471,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,295,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.