↓ Skip to main content

Rapamycin and Alzheimer disease: a hypothesis for the effective use of rapamycin for treatment of neurodegenerative disease

Overview of attention for article published in Autophagy, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapamycin and Alzheimer disease: a hypothesis for the effective use of rapamycin for treatment of neurodegenerative disease
Published in
Autophagy, February 2023
DOI 10.1080/15548627.2023.2175569
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julian M Carosi, Timothy J Sargeant

Abstract

In 2019 we summarized work relating to the potential use of rapamycin for treating Alzheimer disease (AD). We considered the commentary necessary because use of rapamycin in people with AD is a very real prospect and we wanted to present a balanced view of the likely consequences of MTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase) inhibition in the AD brain. We concluded that use of rapamycin, an MTOR inhibitor that increases macroautophagy/autophagy, could hold promise for prevention of AD if used early enough. However, MTOR inhibition appeared ineffectual in resolving existing amyloid pathology in AD mouse models. In this View article, we update these observations with new studies that have used rapamycin in AD models and provide evidence both for and against its use in AD. We also discuss rapamycin in the light of new research that describes rapamycin-induced autophagic stress in the ageing brain and autophagic stress as the origin of the amyloid plaque itself. We conclude that rapamycin will have complex effects on the brain in AD. Further, we hypothesize that lysosomal degradative capacity in the brain will likely determine how effective or detrimental rapamycin will be as a treatment of AD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Psychology 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,859,692
of 25,235,400 outputs
Outputs from Autophagy
#134
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,213
of 477,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Autophagy
#5
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,235,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.