You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Protein quality and the food matrix: defining optimal versus maximal meal-based protein intakes for stimulating muscle protein synthesis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, February 2022
|
DOI | 10.1139/apnm-2022-0373 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Takeshi M. Barnes, Max T. Deutz, Žan Zupančič, Andrew T. Askow, Daniel R. Moore, Nicholas A. Burd |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
Sweden | 2 | 10% |
United States | 2 | 10% |
Canada | 2 | 10% |
India | 1 | 5% |
Bahamas | 1 | 5% |
Japan | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 8 | 38% |
Members of the public | 7 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,757,874
of 25,459,177 outputs
Outputs from Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
#493
of 2,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,062
of 518,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,459,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.