↓ Skip to main content

Protein quality and the food matrix: defining optimal versus maximal meal-based protein intakes for stimulating muscle protein synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protein quality and the food matrix: defining optimal versus maximal meal-based protein intakes for stimulating muscle protein synthesis
Published in
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, February 2022
DOI 10.1139/apnm-2022-0373
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takeshi M. Barnes, Max T. Deutz, Žan Zupančič, Andrew T. Askow, Daniel R. Moore, Nicholas A. Burd

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 3 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,757,874
of 25,459,177 outputs
Outputs from Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
#493
of 2,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,062
of 518,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,459,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.