↓ Skip to main content

Genome-Wide Association Study Points to Novel Locus for Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Psychiatry, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
reddit
1 Redditor
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genome-Wide Association Study Points to Novel Locus for Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome
Published in
Biological Psychiatry, February 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.01.023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fotis Tsetsos, Apostolia Topaloudi, Pritesh Jain, Zhiyu Yang, Dongmei Yu, Petros Kolovos, Zeynep Tumer, Renata Rizzo, Andreas Hartmann, Christel Depienne, Yulia Worbe, Kirsten R. Müller-Vahl, Danielle C. Cath, Dorret I. Boomsma, Tomasz Wolanczyk, Cezary Zekanowski, Csaba Barta, Zsofia Nemoda, Zsanett Tarnok, Shanmukha S. Padmanabhuni, Joseph D. Buxbaum, Dorothy Grice, Jeffrey Glennon, Hreinn Stefansson, Bastian Hengerer, Evangelia Yannaki, John A. Stamatoyannopoulos, Noa Benaroya-Milshtein, Francesco Cardona, Tammy Hedderly, Isobel Heyman, Chaim Huyser, Pablo Mir, Astrid Morer, Norbert Mueller, Alexander Munchau, Kerstin J. Plessen, Cesare Porcelli, Veit Roessner, Susanne Walitza, Anette Schrag, Davide Martino, The PGC TS Working Group, The TSAICG, Cathy L. Barr, James R. Batterson, Cheston Berlin, Cathy L. Budman, Giovanni Coppola, Nancy J. Cox, Sabrina Darrow, Yves Dion, Nelson B. Freimer, Marco A. Grados, Erica Greenberg, Matthew E. Hirschtritt, Alden Y. Huang, Cornelia Illmann, Robert A. King, Roger Kurlan, James F. Leckman, Gholson J. Lyon, Irene A. Malaty, William M. McMahon, Benjamin M. Neale, Michael S. Okun, Lisa Osiecki, Mary M. Robertson, Guy A. Rouleau, Paul Sandor, Harvey S. Singer, Jan H. Smit, Jae Hoon Sul, The TSGeneSEE Initiative, Christos Androutsos, Entela Basha, Luca Farkas, Jakub Fichna, Piotr Janik, Mira Kapisyzi, Iordanis Karagiannidis, Anastasia Koumoula, Peter Nagy, Joanna Puchala, Natalia Szejko, Urszula Szymanska, Vaia Tsironi, The EMTICS Collaborative Group, Alan Apter, Juliane Ball, Benjamin Bodmer, Emese Bognar, Judith Buse, Marta Correa Vela, Carolin Fremer, Blanca Garcia-Delgar, Mariangela Gulisano, Annelieke Hagen, Julie Hagstrøm, Marcos Madruga-Garrido, Alessandra Pellico, Daphna Ruhrman, Jaana Schnell, Paola Rosaria Silvestri, Liselotte Skov, Tamar Steinberg, Friederike Tagwerker Gloor, Victoria L. Turner, Elif Weidinger, The TS-EUROTRAIN Network, John Alexander, Tamas Aranyi, Wim R. Buisman, Jan K. Buitelaar, Nicole Driessen, Petros Drineas, Siyan Fan, Natalie J. Forde, Sarah Gerasch, Odile A. van den Heuvel, Cathrine Jespersgaard, Ahmad S. Kanaan, Harald E. Möller, Muhammad S. Nawaz, Ester Nespoli, Luca Pagliaroli, Geert Poelmans, Petra J.W. Pouwels, Francesca Rizzo, Dick J. Veltman, Ysbrand D. van der Werf, Joanna Widomska, Nuno R. Zilhäo, The TIC Genetics Collaborative Group, Lawrence W. Brown, Keun-Ah Cheon, Barbara J. Coffey, Thomas V. Fernandez, Donald L. Gilbert, Hyun Ju Hong, Laura Ibanez-Gomez, Eun-Joo Kim, Young Key Kim, Young-Shin Kim, Yun-Joo Koh, Sodahm Kook, Samuel Kuperman, Bennett L. Leventhal, Athanasios Maras, Tara L. Murphy, Eun-Young Shin, Dong-Ho Song, Jungeun Song, Matthew W. State, Frank Visscher, Sheng Wang, Samuel H. Zinner, Jay A. Tischfield, Gary A. Heiman, A. Jeremy Willsey, Andrea Dietrich, Lea K. Davis, James J. Crowley, Carol A. Mathews, Jeremiah M. Scharf, Marianthi Georgitsi, Pieter J. Hoekstra, Peristera Paschou

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Professor 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 32 59%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 34 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#9,678,764
of 32,276,014 outputs
Outputs from Biological Psychiatry
#3,675
of 7,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,866
of 509,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Psychiatry
#35
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,276,014 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.