↓ Skip to main content

The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation/Heart Failure Society of America Guideline on Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 2,783)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
157 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation/Heart Failure Society of America Guideline on Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support
Published in
Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation, April 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.healun.2022.10.028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander M. Bernhardt, Hannah Copeland, Anita Deswal, Jason Gluck, Michael M. Givertz, Alexander M. Bernhardt, Jason Gluck, Arthur Reshad Garan, Shelley Hall, Awori Hayanga, Ivan Knezevic, Federico Pappalardo, Joyce Wald, Cristiano Amarelli, William L. Baker, David Baran, Daniel Dilling, Airlie Hogan, Anna L. Meyer, Ivan Netuka, Minoru Ono, Federico Pappalardo, Gustavo Parrilla, Duc Thin Pham, Scott Silvestry, Christy Smith, Koji Takeda, Sunu S. Thomas, Esther Vorovich, Michael M. Givertz, Jo Ellen Rodgers, Nana Aburjania, Jean M. Connors, Jasmin S. Hanke, Elrina Joubert-Huebner, Gal Levy, Ann E. Woolley, Hannah Copeland, David L.S. Morales, Amanda Vest, Francisco A. Arabia, Michael Carrier, Christopher T. Salerno, Benedikt Schrage, Anita Deswal, Savitri Fedson, Larry A. Allen, Cynthia J. Bither, Shannon Dunlay, Paola Morejon, Kay Kendall, Michael Kiernan, Sean Pinney, Stephan Schueler, Peter Macdonald, Diyar Saeed, Evgenij Potapov, Tien M.H. Ng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 157 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Researcher 8 8%
Other 4 4%
Lecturer 2 2%
Librarian 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 72 69%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 72 69%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2023.
All research outputs
#358,311
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation
#30
of 2,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,350
of 425,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation
#2
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.