| Title |
The relationship timeline: A method for the study of shared lived experiences in relational contexts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Life Course Research, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.alcr.2016.07.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
Lifeline methods-graphic illustrations of the pathways of lived experience traveled by individuals from birth to anticipated death-have been useful in the study of lived experience. Existing lifeline methods and research focus on the individual experience; absent from this literature are the collective experiences of those in intimate relationships. In this paper, based on our research with 120 same-sex couples, we present a method to allow for the joint creation of relationship timelines, which serve as the basis for eliciting dyadic data in multiple forms: graphic representations of relationship development through couples' creation of a timeline of key events and periods; qualitative narratives of couples' shared experiences; and quantitative ratings of significant events and periods in their lives together. Lessons learned from the application of this Relationship Timeline Method are discussed, as are implications for future study of the shared lived experience. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 83% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 14 | 22% |
| Psychology | 8 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 34% |